<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    <rss version="2.0">
        <channel>
            <title>Consumers: 3567 results found</title>
            <description>Search results</description>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Consultation on the methodology to determine the WACC used in cost models - Overview of the answers]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/consumers/publication/consultation-on-the-methodology-to-determine-the-wacc-used-in-cost-models-overview-of-the-answers</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Consultation on the methodology to determine the WACC used in cost models - Overview of the answers]]></description>
                <pubDate>2005-12-29 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Decision of 28 December 2005 regarding amendments to the BROBA 2006 offer]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/consumers/publication/decision-of-28-december-2005-regarding-amendments-to-the-broba-2006-offer</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Decision of 28 December 2005 regarding amendments to the BROBA 2006 offer]]></description>
                <pubDate>2005-12-28 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Decision of 22 December 2005 regarding amendments to the BRUO 2006 offer]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/consumers/publication/decision-of-22-december-2005-regarding-amendments-to-the-bruo-2006-offer</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Decision of 22 December 2005 regarding amendments to the BRUO 2006 offer]]></description>
                <pubDate>2005-12-23 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[: Decision of 22 December 2005 – BRIO offer 2006]]></title>
        <link>/index.php/consumers/topic/decision-of-22-december-2005-brio-offer-2006</link>
        <description><![CDATA[This decision on the 2006 BRIO offer was annulled in part by the judgement of the Court of Appeal of 27 June 2008 following an appeal filed by Belgacom, which then withdrew concerning the remainder of the action (judgement of 3 March 2009).]]></description>
                    </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Decision of 22 December 2005 regarding the proposal of reference interconnect offer of Belgacom for the year 2006 (French)]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/consumers/publication/decision-of-22-december-2005-regarding-the-proposal-of-reference-interconnect-offer-of-belgacom-for-the-year-2006-french</link>
                <description><![CDATA[BIPT decision of 22 December 2005 regarding the proposal of reference interconnect offer of Belgacom for the year 2006 (French)]]></description>
                <pubDate>2005-12-22 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Judgement of the Court of Appeal of 9 December 2005 (BRUO 2004)]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/consumers/publication/judgement-of-the-court-of-appeal-of-9-december2005-bruo-2004</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Judgement of the Court of Appeal of 9 December 2005 (BRUO 2004)]]></description>
                <pubDate>2005-12-09 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[BIPT communication regarding a consultation by the lRG (Independent Regulators Group)]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/consumers/publication/bipt-communication-regarding-a-consultation-by-the-lrg-independent-regulators-group</link>
                <description><![CDATA[BIPT communication regarding a consultation by the lRG (Independent Regulators Group)]]></description>
                <pubDate>2005-12-01 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Judgement of the Council of State of 29 November 2005 (Decree of 29 March 2002 of the Flemish Government on the granting of licences)]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/consumers/publication/judgement-of-the-council-of-state-of-29-november-2005-decree-of-29march2002-of-the-flemish-government-on-the-granting-of-licences</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Judgement of the Council of State of 29 November 2005 (Decree of 29 March 2002 of the Flemish Government on the granting of licences)]]></description>
                <pubDate>2005-11-29 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[: Decision of 25 November 2005 – 2006 BROBA offer]]></title>
        <link>/index.php/consumers/topic/decision-of-25-november-2005-2006-broba-offer</link>
        <description><![CDATA[This decision is about the 2006 BROBA offer. Following an appeal lodged by Belgacom, an interlocutory judgement was given about it by the Brussels Court of Appeal on 31 March 2009.]]></description>
                    </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Decision of 25 November 2005 on Belgacom's reference offer for bitstream access - version 2006 - BROBA 2006]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/consumers/publication/decision-of-25-november-2005-on-belgacom-s-reference-offer-for-bitstream-access-version-2006-broba-2006</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Decision of 25 November 2005 on Belgacom's reference offer for bitstream access - version 2006 - BROBA 2006]]></description>
                <pubDate>2005-11-25 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            </channel>
    </rss>