<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    <rss version="2.0">
        <channel>
            <title>Consumers: 141 results found</title>
            <description>Search results</description>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Décision du 1er avril 2014 - BROBA et WBA Addendum Specificiations for P=5 Service Quality: Decision of 1 April 2014 – BROBA and WBA Addendum Specifications for P=5 Service Quality]]></title>
        <link>/index.php/consumers/topic/decision-of-1-april-2014-broba-and-wba-addendum-specifications-for-p5-service-quality</link>
        <description><![CDATA[This decision concerns an addendum to the BROBA and WBA VDSL2 reference offers allowing Belgacom to complement the description of the features of the P=5 service quality.]]></description>
                    </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Décision du 19 février 2014 - WBA Vectoring: Decision of 19 February 2014 – WBA Vectoring]]></title>
        <link>/index.php/consumers/topic/decision-of-19-february-2014-wba-vectoring</link>
        <description><![CDATA[This decision analyses the addendum of Belgacom to the WBA VDSL2 offer introducing new profiles based on the VDSL2 vectoring technology.]]></description>
                    </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Décisions du 11 décembre 2013 et du 19 février 2016 relatives aux tarifs pour l’accès aux réseaux câblés en Région de Bruxelles-Capitale: Decisions of 11 December 2013 and 19 February 2016 on the access tariffs to cable networks in the bilingual Brussels-Capital Region]]></title>
        <link>/index.php/consumers/topic/decisions-of-11-december-2013-and-19-february-2016-on-the-access-tariffs-to-cable-networks-in-the-bilingual-brussels-capital-region</link>
        <description><![CDATA[These decisions concern the wholesale tariffs for access services to cable networks in the bilingual Brussels-Capital Region. Identical decisions were taken simultaneously by the CRC regarding the Dutch-speaking Region, the French-speaking Region and the German-speaking Region.]]></description>
                    </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Décision du 3 septembre 2013 - Offre de référence de Brutélé en Région de Bruxelles-Capitale: Decision of 3 September 2013 – Brutélé reference offer in the bilingual Brussels-Capital Region]]></title>
        <link>/index.php/consumers/topic/decision-of-3-september-2013-brutele-reference-offer-in-the-bilingual-brussels-capital-region</link>
        <description><![CDATA[This decision of the CRC concerns the reference offer of Brutélé in the bilingual Brussels-Capital Region.]]></description>
                    </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Décision du 3 septembre 2013 - Offre de référence de Coditel en Région de Bruxelles-Capitale: Decision of 3 September 2013 – Coditel reference offer in the bilingual Brussels-Capital Region]]></title>
        <link>/index.php/consumers/topic/decision-of-3-september-2013-coditel-reference-offer-in-the-bilingual-brussels-capital-region</link>
        <description><![CDATA[This decision of the CRC concerns the reference offer of Coditel in the bilingual Brussels-Capital Region.]]></description>
                    </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Décision du 3 septembre 2013 - Offre de référence de Telenet en Région de Bruxelles-Capitale: Decision of 3 September 2013 – Telenet reference offer in the bilingual Brussels-Capital Region]]></title>
        <link>/index.php/consumers/topic/decision-of-3-september-2013-telenet-reference-offer-in-the-bilingual-brussels-capital-region</link>
        <description><![CDATA[This decision concerns the reference offer of Telenet in the bilingual Brussels-Capital Region.]]></description>
                    </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Décision du 8 août 2013 – Analyse du marché des lignes louées 2013: Decision of 8 August 2013 – Leased lines market analysis 2013]]></title>
        <link>/index.php/consumers/topic/decision-of-8-august-2013-leased-lines-market-analysis-2013</link>
        <description><![CDATA[This decision defines a national leased lines market based on SDH, WDM and Ethernet technologies, regardless of the speed. It concludes that Belgacom (now: Proximus) has significant power in this market and, as a consequence, imposes a series of remedies on the operator.]]></description>
                    </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Décision du 31 janvier 2013 – Analyse du marché d’accès téléphonique fixe 2013: Decision of 31 January 2013 – Fixed telephony access market analysis 2013]]></title>
        <link>/index.php/consumers/topic/decision-of-31-january-2013-fixed-telephony-access-market-analysis-2013</link>
        <description><![CDATA[This decision designates Belgacom (now: Proximus) as having significant market power and imposes a series of obligations to fulfil on the operator.]]></description>
                    </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Décision du 2 mars 2012 – Analyse du marché FTR 2012: Decision of 2 March 2012 – FTR market analysis 2012]]></title>
        <link>/index.php/consumers/topic/decision-of-2-march-2012-ftr-market-analysis-2012</link>
        <description><![CDATA[This decision designates Belgacom (now: Proximus) as having significant market power and imposes a series of obligations to fulfil on the operator.]]></description>
                    </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Décisions du 4 janvier 2012 et du 4 octobre 2012 concernant l’alternative au multicast: Decisions of 4 January 2012 and 4 October 2012 on the alternative to multicast]]></title>
        <link>/index.php/consumers/topic/decisions-of-4-january-2012-and-4-october-2012-on-the-alternative-to-multicast</link>
        <description><![CDATA[While Belgacom was obliged by the decision of the CRC of 1 July 2011 to provide the “multicast” functionality to competing operators, the operator proposed an alternative solution to BIPT. This proposition was evaluated in the first decision listed on this page, while the second concerned qualitative aspects of the reference offer proposed by Belgacom.]]></description>
                    </item>
            </channel>
    </rss>