<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    <rss version="2.0">
        <channel>
            <title>Operators: 3283 results found</title>
            <description>Search results</description>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[BIPT analysis of zero rating of apps in the Proximus offers]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/operators/publication/bipt-analysis-of-zero-rating-of-apps-in-the-proximus-offers</link>
                <description><![CDATA[In this report BIPT sets out its findings regarding the investigation and the analysis of Proximus’ offers in which zero rating is applied.
In the case of zero rating the Internet Service Provider does not consider the data traffic of a specific application or category of applications for the data limit.
This results in free data for this specific application or category of applications.
In Proximus’ offers, launched on 17 October 2016, customers get zero rating for one favourite app they have to pick from a list of 6 possible applications: Facebook, WhatsApp, Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter or Pokémon Go.
BIPT’s first finding is that Proximus doesn’t discriminate (in the sense of the European Regulation regarding open Internet access) between the chosen favourite app and the remaining data traffic when the surf volume included in the allowance is exhausted.
Next BIPT concludes, in an analysis that was recommended in the BEREC Guidelines (the European umbrella for telecom regulators), that there are no elements at the moment indicating that the zero rating of apps by Proximus endangers the Internet users’ rights to consult information and content freely, to share it and to use and provide the applications and services of their choice.
BIPT nevertheless continues to monitor the numbers regarding the offers of Proximus and the use of apps and will continue to monitor the operators attitude towards open Internet access.]]></description>
                <pubDate>2017-01-30 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Consultation on a draft article of law at the request of the Minister]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/operators/publication/consultation-on-a-draft-article-of-law-at-the-request-of-the-minister</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Consultation of the BIPT Council of 17 January 2017 at the request of the Vice-premier and Minister of the Digital Agenda, Telecom and Postal Services on a draft Article of Law regarding the measures to gear the rate of numbers allowing payment service users to block their payment tool to the tariff principles of the Code of Economic Law.
Deadline: until 16 February 2017
Replies can be sent to: consultation.sg@ibpt.be Regarding: "CONSULT-2017-A2"]]></description>
                <pubDate>2017-01-18 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Communication by the BIPT Council of 20 December 2016 regarding the monitoring of the universal telecommunications service 2015-2016]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/operators/publication/communication-by-the-bipt-council-of-20-december-2016-regarding-the-monitoring-of-the-universal-telecommunications-service-2015-2016</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Communication by the BIPT Council of 20 December 2016 regarding the monitoring of the universal telecommunications service 2015-2016]]></description>
                <pubDate>2017-01-13 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Judgement of the Brussels Court of Appeal of 14 December 2016 ordering the removal of the appeal lodged by Telenet Tecteo Bidco against the letter of BIPT of 27 June 2014 regarding the unique fee for the use of the 900 MHz and 1800 MHz frequency bands]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/operators/publication/judgement-of-the-brussels-court-of-appeal-of-14-december-2016-ordering-the-removal-of-the-appeal-lodged-by-telenet-tecteo-bidco-against-the-letter-of-bipt-of-27-june-2014-regarding-the-unique-fee-for-the-use-of-the-900-mhz-and-1800-mhz-frequency-bands</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Judgement of the Brussels Court of Appeal of 14 December 2016 ordering the removal of the appeal lodged by Telenet Tecteo Bidco against the letter of BIPT of 27 June 2014 regarding the unique fee for the use of the 900 MHz and 1800 MHz frequency bands]]></description>
                <pubDate>2017-01-05 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Consultation on the draft decision regarding the coexistence of the 4G operators in the 2500-2690 MHz band and the radars in the 2700-2900 MHz band]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/operators/publication/consultation-on-the-draft-decision-regarding-the-coexistence-of-the-4g-operators-in-the-2500-2690-mhz-band-and-the-radars-in-the-2700-2900-mhz-band</link>
                <description><![CDATA[The decision, which will replace a decision from 2011, is to ensure coexistence between aeronautical radars of Belgocontrol and of the Ministry of Defence in the 2700-2900 MHz frequency band on the one hand and the use of the 2500-2690 MHz band by 4G operators on the other hand.Deadline: until 25 January 2017 
Ref. : «CONSULT-2016-D9»
Address: consultation.sg@bipt.be 
Contact persons: Michael Vandroogenbroek (02 226 88 11)]]></description>
                <pubDate>2016-12-22 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Report of the BIPT Council of 5 December 2016 on the verification of the licence obligations of TBC-Post after three years of activity]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/operators/publication/report-of-the-bipt-council-of-5-december-2016-on-the-verification-of-the-licence-obligations-of-tbc-post-after-three-years-of-activity</link>
                <description><![CDATA[The Act of 21 March 1991 on the reform of certain economic public companies puts BIPT in charge of the publication of a yearly report on the respect of the obligations imposed on postal licence holders. Therefore, BIPT verified the compliance of TBC-Post with its licence conditions after three years of activity. Following this verification, BIPT noted a number of shortcomings which TBC-Post immediately rectified. This verification thus showed that TBC-Post fulfils the obligations it is expected to after three years of activity.]]></description>
                <pubDate>2016-12-21 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Opinion of 13 December 2016 regarding the bpost investment project aiming to increase the quality of the priority single-piece letter post items]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/operators/publication/opinion-of-13-december-2016-regarding-the-bpost-investment-project-aiming-to-increase-the-quality-of-the-priority-single-piece-letter-post-items</link>
                <description><![CDATA[In its decision of 10 October 2016 on the delivery times for the year 2015 BIPT established that bpost does not comply with its legal obligations regarding the delivery times for priority single-piece letter post items.
Consequently BIPT imposed a remedy upon bpost which ought to improve the quality in the short term for the category of priority single-piece letter post items.
This investment project has been checked as regards its aim, the impact on quality enhancement of the priority single-piece letter post items, detailed planning and financing.
BIPT believes that the investment project complies with the terms and conditions as laid down in above-mentioned decision.
BIPT will monitor the actual implementation thereof.]]></description>
                <pubDate>2016-12-14 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Belgium generally maintains an average price level compared to its neighbours]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/operators/publication/belgium-generally-maintains-an-average-price-level-compared-to-its-neighbours</link>
                <description><![CDATA[Belgium generally maintains an average price level compared to its neighbours.]]></description>
                <pubDate>2016-12-13 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Comparative study price level telecom products in Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Germany, Luxemburg and the United Kingdom [Tariffs from August 2016]]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/operators/publication/comparative-study-price-level-telecom-products-in-belgium-france-the-netherlands-germany-luxemburg-and-the-united-kingdom-tariffs-from-august-2016</link>
                <description><![CDATA[BIPT publishes for the fifth time a benchmark study of the prices for telecom products in Belgium and our neighbouring countries (the Netherlands, France, Germany, Luxemburg and the United Kingdom).]]></description>
                <pubDate>2016-12-13 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Opinion of 30 November 2016 on the 2015 improvement plan and the 2016 action plan following the customer satisfaction survey for the year 2015]]></title>
                <link>/index.php/operators/publication/opinion-of-30-november-2016-on-the-2015-improvement-plan-and-the-2016-action-plan-following-the-customer-satisfaction-survey-for-the-year-2015</link>
                <description><![CDATA[According to the information it has, BIPT notices that measurements were conducted by bpost in order to determine the level of its customers' satisfaction in 2015 and issues a favourable opinion on the realisation of the 2015 improvement plan and improvement measures considered for 2016. The satisfaction is better in comparison to 2014, improving from 86.5 to 87.5%.]]></description>
                <pubDate>2016-12-08 00:00</pubDate>
                </item>
            </channel>
    </rss>